![]() |
UNSPOKEN BRICKS |
Per l'esordio di questo spazio è stato scelto un argomento caro a tutti i fans: la realizzazione dell'album "The Wall", con una storia imperniata su due interviste esclusive del nostro Christian Diemoz a Bob Ezrin e James Guthrie, personaggi chiave di quell'opera. Buona lettura!!!
SPECIAL #1: UNSPOKEN BRICKS
Unspoken
bricks
Ezrin and Guthrie ring their bell on “The Wall”
by
Christian Diemoz
Introduction:
how many untold bricks?
Despite
Pink Floyd’s historical discretion, nowadays we probably know more details on The
Wall, than what Roger Waters, the mind behind this masterpiece, would like
us to. Many “disclosed bricks” came from interviews, like the fundamental
one by BBC host Tommy Vance (aired on 1st November 1979), or from the
outstanding “Inside Out” book, recently out by drummer Nick Mason (dedicating
the chapter “Writings On The Wall” to the concept project which emanated
from the 1977 in-famous “spitting incident”).
In
a sincerity effort, however, it has to be mentioned that much is known thanks to
less public sources. Every fan sure experienced goosebumps by listening to the
set of demos with different (early) lyrics and musical atmospheres for many lp
tracks. The same happened thanks to the three pro-shot videos witnessing gigs of
the 1980/81 tours (New York, London and Dortmund). Equally inspiring were some
recording logs (learning us that our Graal was known, in CBS close circle, as
“PROJECT # 5622-2”), and the storyboard for Alan Parker’s film (both
spreaded from the internet months ago).
Satisfied by these “alternative voices”, but willing to go deeper, yours truly tried to tear down some more “unspoken bricks”, and contacted two of the key figures in the album team: producer Bob Ezrin and co-producer James Guthrie, who lent to the band also his able engineer hand. Luckily enough, they kindly opened the door at first knock. What follows is their toll of the bell on the story of the album that marked a “no-turning back” point for Pink Floyd. Undoubtedly, they shed more light on a work that finds its roots in paranoia and obscure colours, so that respect and gratefulness have to be paid them for their memories recollection.
The
approach: genesis of a masterpiece
The
Wall
got released on 30th November 1979. Work started on it a year before,
when Roger Waters submitted to band members two demos, as ideas to be developed
in order to become Pink Floyd’s last album of the eighties. Bricks In The
Wall got the majority of votes, making The Pros And Cons Of Hitch-Hiking
fall in Roger’s personal drawer, and turned into group’s new mission. During
the autumn of 1978, Floyd then started to make rough versions of some tracks at
Britannia Row, the habitual “recording bunker” for the group.
As
for the personnel to be involved in the project, “Inside Out” clears how the
band “started looking and asking round for a young but talented engineer
with a track record who could bring a different approach to our sound”. In
the end, Alan Parsons recommended James Guthrie, “who had been producing and
engineering a number of bands, including Heatwave, The Movies and Judas Priest”.
His track record, “particularly an instantly identifiable shimmering audio
edge he had brought to his work with Runner, suggested that he could add a fresh,
brighter feel to our work”.
At
that time, James knew Pink Floyd by their name and fame. “I had never
attended a show, - he explains - but I was familiar with the music.
‘See Emily Play’ had quite an affect on me when I first heard it. I think I
was 13 when I bought that record. I was playing it to all my friends saying,
‘You’ve got to listen to this!’. That’s still one of my favourite Floyd
songs. Then of course, ‘Meddle’ and ‘Dark Side’. I was not familiar with
their gear or methods, just stories that you hear. I actually became a much
bigger fan by working with them”.
Soon
after he spoke his “yes” to manager Steve O’ Rourke, James met Roger, to
discuss the concept of the album. It might sound as a standard procedure, but
for details lover Guthrie it had more to do with a working philosophy/state of
mind. “It’s very important to have a clear understanding of what an
artist is trying to achieve. Obviously, the creative direction is going to
change once you get into making the album, that’s normal, but the only way to
help realize someone’s vision is to have a sympathetic view of it. After that,
you can bring your own ideas to the project. But the focus must start with their
vision. Remember, the rest of the band were just getting to grips with the
project as well. They would eventually all bring their own personalities to the
music”. As it concerns his first encounter with Waters, James recalls that
it was “mostly just to see how the chemistry was between us. To see how we
got on. We talked about past projects that I had done, which bits he liked and
he explained his concept for the ‘The Wall’ and gave me a copy of his
demo”.
The
scale and challenge of the project seemed overwhelming and was immediately
attractive to the young engineer. “Roger was an imposing figure, very
direct in his communication. He was testing me. After our first meeting, we had
regular phone conversations, more meetings with the rest of the band and we
began work, just the five of us, in October of 1978 at Britannia Row Studios in
London”. Guthrie soon realised it wasn’t to be as simple as that. “Roger
had written enough material for three albums, so we began by arranging and
recording the most complete songs. That way we could start to get our heads
around the shape of the story. At that time they were still playing together
more as a band, rather than one guy at a time, which is the way we ended up
recording in France. Working on a concept album is akin to making a movie. How
you tell the story is all important”.
On
the other hand, to go on with Nick Mason’s book, “the infinitely patient
James was a complementary counterbalance to the extremely energetic and often
irascible Bob Ezrin. Although we had produced Dark Side and Wish You
Were Here ourselves, Roger had decided to import Bob as a co-producer and
collaborator. Bob was an established producer who had worked on a number of
Alice Cooper albums and Lou Reed’s Berlin”. He first met the band
at Britannia Row too. “When
I first heard the demos, I knew that I was about to embark on the making of a
great Pink Floyd album and every one of the past ones had been milestones in
their own way. But I didn’t realize how important the album was going to be
until we did our first rough sequence of the rough tracks and demos”.
After
moving its first steps in the United Kingdom, The Wall – as James
Guthrie mentioned – got developed in France. In Nick Mason’s words, this
happened because “although Britannia Row had been adequate for recording Animals,
it now became clear that it was not up to the task for The Wall. We had already
installed a large quantity of replacement equipment. This was primarily due to
Bob and James wanting to upgrade it to their own demanding standards, and it
seems that everyone who arrived to work on the production side also brought
along their own preferred piece of kit”.
Exile
had, however, to be embraced also due to financial reasons (notoriously, the
Norton Warburg crack). Bob Ezrin sees this matter, more than any technical issue,
as the main reason for the recording party to temporarily transfer in the area
surrounding Nice. “Britro would have been perfectly acceptable to me,
but the band had made a business decision to take their activities out of
Britain for a year, so we were forced to move recording elsewhere”.
That’s why, to quote our favoirte drummer once again, “like
naughty children abandoning an untidy playroom, we were able to leave the
financial mess behind for the professionals to clear up”.
The
sessions: war of the Gods
You
can’t figure out how a Pink Floyd recording session could be, unless you
attend one. Magic has to be in the air (or, to better say, in the studio). This
is the main idea yours truly made, after hearing James and Bob on this side of
the story. The attempt to make Guthrie highlight a couple “peaks” along the
creative path for The Wall, for example, simply went unsuccessful. “It’s
very difficult for me to pick two moments because I’m so wrapped up in the
project. Also, the technical and musical aspects of making an album merge into
one thing for me. Really, the songs are the high point. But in terms of the
process, there are some great memories. Just a few of which are: Witnessing
Roger’s vision. The first time I recorded David and had the instant
recognition of that amazing voice. Helping arrange the songs at the very
beginning, as the project began to take shape around us. Building guitar solos
from multiple performances. Playing drums with Nick on ‘Happiest Days’
and string synths with David on ‘Empty Spaces’. Layering textures of
acoustic, electric and lap steel guitars. More textures of Rick’s keyboards (he
played much more on the album than people give him credit for). Hearing
Michael’s beautiful orchestrations”.
About
orchestra parts, Ezrin has a personal story to tell. “The
band and I agreed that I could build side 3 of the double album - the
side that was mostly orchestrated. The reason for the orchestration was that the
album reached the point of surreality by side 3 - became like a journey
through the Looking Glass. Michael Kamen was not only my best friend but
also my collaborator on a number of projects before PF and my musical brother.
We spoke a common language and we orchestrated the album together - mostly in my
rented apartment in Toronto with one of us at the piano and the other one at the
table writing. We did the recording in NY at Columbia Studios”.
However,
atmosphere had to be not so heavenly as these lines seem to paint. Chronicles
are plenty of stories about this being the most flawed time in band members’
relationships, especially between Roger and Rick (with the latter clashing with
the former after he rejected his request to count among lp’s producers). Both
our interviewees agree, even if truth is not always exactly what reporters write.
“Most
of the personal disputes –
says James - were already established before The Wall. Certainly
Roger’s relationship with Rick, but things did deteriorate further on that
level during the making of the album. There were some very difficult moments,
but I don’t think there was ever a question of Roger not finishing the album.
He’s a very strong person. Not easily deterred from his path. If everyone else
had walked out, he would still have finished it”. On his side, Bob Ezrin
situates on almost the same wavelength: “Rick
was looking for respect from Roger and a sense that he was a valued member of
the band. He was definitely feeling Roger becoming more and more distant from
him. He was becoming insecure about his role. He had good reason to be.
Roger was particularly hard on him”.
Another
Brick pt. II: back to juke-boxes
The
Wall
has to be owed for many things, included bringing Floyd back to release singles,
a format they abandoned in 1968. Choice fell on Another Brick In The Wall pt.
II, soon to become band’s insignia throughout the whole world, despite an
unusual (for Pink Floyd, obviously) disco mood. Many observers - and Nick Mason
is among them - credit Bob Ezrin for this release, recalling his long time dream
to play a starring part in a successful disco single. Needless to say, he denies:
“I pushed it through
because I knew that it was an undeniable hit song. The band was not interested
in singles but that was the culture I came from and so I was determined to make
it into one. They only played one verse and one chorus and refused to do more. I
copied those and created a second verse and chorus and decided to add the kids.
It was obviously a winning formula”.
Oh
yes, the chorus. It’s undeniable those Islington Green School children
obstinately singing “We don’t need no education” gave the track a
personality by itself. Many interviews and documentaries, however, agree on the
fact London based engineer
Nick Griffiths (serving Floyd at Britannia Row, while they were in the US)
didn’t follow the original band request while putting together that part.
Anyways, would it be possible to imagine Another Brick
without that particular choir phrase? Here comes James Guthrie’s advice: “It was great; instant atmosphere. We actually sent Nick a 24 track
tape, with a stereo mix of the song on 2 tracks and asked him to fill up the
rest of the tracks with different performances of the kids. That way we would
have plenty of choices when making a balance, which we then transferred to the
master tape. On one take, he put some of the kids into an echoey stair well. I
used a lot of that one in the mix. It really helped to increase the size of the
chorus”. About
“who made what”, James has his own mind: “I’ve read numerous
interviews about this subject and there’s been a lot of arguing over the years
as to who came up with the idea. It was Roger’s idea to have the school kids
sing. That was the big deal. The process of adding an extra verse with just the
kids singing on their own was obvious. I instinctively put together a rough mix
with the new arrangement, but everyone already knew it was the right thing to
do. I don’t understand what all the fuss was about. Anyone making the record
would have done that”.
On
the reasons for a comeback to singles, many speculations can be done. The
appetite for an immediate commercial profit remains the easiest one, while
others (about Floyd trying to stay on the wave, with many major bands exploring
dance path, like The Rolling Stones with Miss You and Queen with Hot
Space) are less probable, but possible. On this subject, though, Guthrie
conserves a clear view. “The band were not looking to follow anyone else
and I think their attitude toward singles had changed over the years.
Particularly since ‘Money’ had received so much air play without
initially being released as a single. Sometimes the radio DJs just pick their
own singles. The band were actually quite happy with the idea of selling lots of
records! As the album took shape, ‘Brick 2’ was clearly the best
choice for a first single. We were not trying to make it blatantly commercial,
just a good groove. But the commerciality of Roger’s chorus hook was already
clear on his demo and the school kids certainly helped”.
Mixing
The
Wall: sparkling or smooth?
The
chapter previous to the release of the double album that disclosed Pink’s
odyssey to the masses saw a major argument between Roger Waters and David
Gilmour, the other two producers of the lp. Something of that kind already
happened for Dark Side Of The Moon, and like in 1973 this had to do with
real artistic issues, rather than with personal rows. “Mostly
– tells Bob Ezrin - we all had
a common vision of the sound and scope of the album by mixing time. There were a
few notable points of contention, the most famous of which surrounded
Comfortably Numb and the orchestration. David didn’t want it in the body of
the song and Roger and I did. We negotiated this for weeks before it was finally
agreed to leave it in this form. I think we made the right choice”.
Questioned
on the mixing days, James Guthrie remembers the tensions between the band and
CBS/Sony, the label who later released the album. Guess that their head of
promotion even came to claim the finished work “a travesty of the
record he’d first been played”. An unexpected hard behaviour, if one
considers that Floyd always scored overwhelming success. “Well, I don’t know who that executive was, or quite when he’d been
played an earlier version. – states Guthrie - The thing about the Floyd is that they never involve
the record label in the making of an album. They have a production deal, money
changes hands and they say, ‘You’ll hear it when it’s done’. There were
probably some people at the label who took exception to that approach. Most of
the tension was to do with making a Christmas release date. Someone did threaten
to come down to the studio and take the tapes from us, but they would never have
got away with it. This band has an enormous amount of clout. There was a
race to get it done, though. That always creates tension. The artistic tension
was to be expected when you’re trying to get a group of strong willed
individuals to agree on something”.
For
sure, a funny moment came with the first record company playback of the album. “At
last, we had finished. – recalls James - A playback reception was
organized at CBS records in Los Angeles, as an opportunity for the whole company
to hear what we had been doing for the past year. I took a ¼” tape of the
completed album to the conference room, where the reception would be held later
that evening. They had a sound system with huge JBL speakers and I played some
of the mixes just to check that everything would sound good for the party”.
Hundreds
of people were expected. Everyone duly arrived and helped themselves to the
spread of food and drink. “The air was turbulent with anticipation. What
had the band been up to? What could they expect? We turned up the volume, the
room went quiet, and ‘In The Flesh?’ burst from the speakers. Guitars and
drums assaulting the guests. ‘Lights!’ Roger’s voice filled the room.
‘Roll the sound effects!’ The Stuka dive bombers (which, incidentally, were
taken from original wire recordings made during the war) screeched down on us
with their intimidating sirens and, as they reached the peak of their dive, blew
out the right hand speaker. One song into the album and we had to stop the tape!
The search began. We set off around the building trying to find a big office
with a half-decent sound system. We moved quickly through the vacant rooms as
everyone was either at the reception or had already gone home. Nothing! This was
a major record label and we couldn’t find a proper playback system for the
album. How could they tell who they were signing? Eventually, we found a corner
office with a reasonable pair of bookshelf speakers. The room wasn’t nearly
big enough for this many people. Phil Taylor (in charge for the sound
equipment) and I looked at each other. The furniture would have to come out!
We removed the poor guy’s desk, his couch, chairs, anything that moved.
Dimming the lights, we grabbed cushions from the other offices and scattered
them across the floor. First come, first served! People filed in and lay down on
the cushions. Within minutes, the place looked like an opium den. We pushed
‘play’ and a few minutes later it started to smell like one too. The
overflow was out the doorway and down the hall. The record label had been
transformed”.
Wiser
after the event?
It’s
always easy to look at things years after, when you know how the story ended,
and who married the Princess. More difficult is to take the right step, at the
appropriate moment, when you’re in the middle of a dance. Anyways, Guthrie,
had he to be given again the chance to re-live The Wall days, would not
change much of what he decided and did. “In retrospect, there are always
things that you feel could be improved. The thing is that the album works as a
whole. It tells the story in a very atmospheric way and with some exceptional
songs. I suppose it would have been nice to have them playing together as a band
more, but they weren’t in that space in those days and who knows; maybe the
difference wouldn’t have been as good. I think I’ll leave it as it is.
Although it would be fun to do a 5.1 version. If that happens, I would put ‘What
Shall We Do Now?’ back in. We had run time restrictions in those days, due
to the vinyl release format”.
Brick
by Brick on the road
With
the work on the album over, James got enrolled in the live Wall troops. He sat
behind the board for the whole 1980 and 1981 tours. As a consequence, his hand
basically signed the 2001 release of Is There Anybody Out There. Ask him
about the nights in Los Angeles, New York, London and Dortmund and you’ll get
an instant picture, both considering technical and human elements, of those
record-breaking shows. “The halls all presented their own challenges.
Earl’s Court was probably the most difficult because it is often used for
exhibitions. Most of the centre section is actually hollow. They pull up the
floor, exposing a deep chamber, flood the area and have boat shows in there! The
real ceiling is about 40 feet above the one that you can see. Cavernous and
acoustically pretty tricky. Dortmund was probably the easiest acoustically, but
our best performances were at the other three. The European audiences were
generally more polite. America tends to be a bit more over the top. But you
encounter big fans everywhere. Every night in L.A. the occupants of the first
ten or so rows of seats immediately in front of the mixing area would light up
‘as one’ on the downbeat of ‘In The Flesh?’ A thick cloud of pot
smoke would drift over us and after a few bars, we were able to see the stage
again”.
If
you ever wondered why German fans were so lucky to be treated with The Wall
concerts, despite halls like Westfalenhalle certainly existing in others
European countries, be aware that “it’s a good question and it seemed a
bit odd to me too. I honestly don’t know. It must have had something to do
with the size of the arena, availability and their willingness to present a show
of that magnitude. Possibly it had something to do with a deal that Steve
O’Rourke had going at the time”.
Conclusions:
a pièce de résistance
Freedom
of mind has to be allowed on The Wall, especially to fans who got
addicted to Floyd in the early seventies. That said, you can complain it’s
commercial, glamourous, or whatever you think, but a serious analysis can’t
omit an element, deserving universal agreement: the only double studio album in
Floyd’s discography outstandingly stands on its feet. Tracks have a strong
element/feeling of cohesion, making the concept fall as hard as a marble block
on listener’s ears.
For
sure, the fact Roger Waters developed the whole project in his own mind before
submitting it to the band (as we all know, he even had a clear idea of the
esthetical side of the opera, i.e. album cover) influenced the final result.
Anyways, even if the making of the lp brought unavoidable sufferances to bassist
mates, some of their contributions undoubtedly increased The Wall shining
potential (even by de-personalising an history that, in his original form, would
have contained too many intimate elements to appear fully understandable). The
same applies for the work conducted by the production team. We’ll never know
how it would have sounded if James wasn’t at the mixing desk, or without Bob
as a producer, or without Michael Kamen directing the orchestra (and without
Steve O’ Rourke, who always knew which keys had to be stroked in order to
obtain that particular result, in the leading position). Significantly enough,
the nature of the project itself applied to his realisation: anyone involved
brought and placed his/her own brick, to build a successful Wall, only to fall
under a Supreme Court judgement, but to resist everything else, time and critic
marks included.
Acknowledgements
A
consistent amount of informations, needed to put together this story, has been
provided by:
-
“HEYOU” fanzine, Italy (www.heyou.it);
-
“Brain Damage Online” website, UK (www.brain-damage.co.uk);
-
Nick Mason’s
“Inside Out”, Weidenfeld &
Nicolson, english version (September 2004);
The
interviews with Bob Ezrin and James Guthrie have been conducted via e-mail,
respectively in April and May 2005.
![]()